# GitHub Pages vs Vercel: which to use in 2026 · Stacktree

Source: https://stacktr.ee/compare/github-pages-vs-vercel

[Skip to content](#main) PFrom Product Hunt? Your first pages are free, no card. Code `PRODUCTHUNT` takes 50% off your first month of Studio.[Start free &rarr;](https://app.stacktr.ee/?join=1&from=producthunt)

&times;   A Stacktree customer sent you. Your first month is 50% off on any plan, taken off at checkout. [Start free &rarr;](https://app.stacktr.ee/?join=1&from=referral)

 &times;    [Stacktree](/)[Developers](/developers)[Agents](/agents)[Docs](/docs)[Use cases](/use-cases)[Pricing](/pricing)[Blog](/blog)[Dashboard](https://app.stacktr.ee)[Sign in →](https://app.stacktr.ee)      By [ Steve Smith ](/about) · Founder, Stacktree  ·  Last updated July 19, 2026          comparison

#  GitHub Pages vs Vercel: which to use in 2026

   GitHub Pages is free static hosting served straight from a repository. Vercel is a full application platform with build pipelines and serverless functions. They overlap on the simple case and diverge fast once you need dynamic behavior or access control. Here is a fair read on both, plus the case where neither is the right shape.

  [ Get started free ](https://app.stacktr.ee/?join=1&from=seo_compare_github_pages_vs_vercel)   install npx stacktree-install
Copy
      No card · 3 pages free · about a minute

##  GitHub Pages vs Vercel: what is the difference?

GitHub Pages publishes static files from a Git repo for free, with custom
      domains and HTTPS but no server runtime. Vercel deploys the same static
      output and adds preview builds, serverless functions, and team features on
      a per-seat paid plan. Choose Pages for plain static sites, Vercel when you
      expect dynamic features.

## Hosting model: repo-served pages vs an app platform

GitHub Pages takes a branch or a built output folder from a repository and
      serves it as a website. The mental model is a folder of files mapped to a
      URL. There is no project dashboard separate from the repo, no runtime, and
      no configuration beyond a settings panel and an optional Jekyll build. That
      simplicity is the point: if your code already lives on GitHub, turning on
      Pages is a few clicks.

Vercel is an application platform. A deployment is a build of your project
      that can include static pages, server-rendered routes, edge logic, and
      serverless functions. Vercel optimizes for frameworks like Next.js, Astro,
      SvelteKit, and Remix, gives every push a unique preview URL, and treats the
      project, not the repo, as the unit you manage. You get the same static
      hosting Pages offers, wrapped in a build and deploy pipeline with more
      moving parts.

## Build and deploy

GitHub Pages can publish a static folder directly, run a Jekyll build, or
      accept output from a GitHub Actions workflow you configure yourself.
      Deploys are tied to a branch. For a hand-written static site this is clean.
      For a modern framework you end up writing and maintaining the Actions
      workflow.

Vercel detects your framework, runs the build for you, and ships a preview
      deployment for every commit and pull request before you promote to
      production. Build caching and instant rollbacks are first-class. This is
      where Vercel genuinely wins: the deploy experience for framework projects
      is faster to set up and gives reviewers a live link per change without
      extra configuration.

## Dynamic capability

This is the clearest split. GitHub Pages is static only. It serves HTML,
      CSS, and client-side JavaScript, and that is the whole runtime. There are
      no API routes, no server-side rendering, and no database. Anything dynamic
      has to call an external service from the browser.

Vercel runs serverless and edge functions, supports server-side rendering,
      and provisions storage and other backend services from the CLI. If your
      site needs form handling, authentication, API endpoints, or rendering per
      request, Vercel can do it in the same project. For genuinely dynamic apps,
      Pages is not a contender and Vercel is the stronger choice.

## Custom domains

Both support custom domains with automatic HTTPS. GitHub Pages lets you
      point an apex or subdomain at your site and provisions a TLS certificate at
      no cost. Vercel supports custom domains with managed certificates on every
      plan, including the free Hobby tier. Setup on either side is a DNS change
      plus a verification step. Neither has a meaningful edge here.

## Pricing model

GitHub Pages is free for public sites within published usage limits (soft
      caps on storage, bandwidth, and build frequency). For most personal and
      open-source projects you never pay for Pages specifically.

Vercel offers a free Hobby plan limited to personal, non-commercial use,
      with builds, custom domains, and functions inside monthly usage limits.
      Commercial work and team collaboration move you to Pro, which starts at $20
      per month per deploying seat (with $20 of included usage credit), plus
      usage-based charges for bandwidth and compute beyond the included
      allowances. The cost model is the main thing to weigh: Pages stays free for
      the static case, while Vercel scales with seats and usage.

## Private access and access control

Both are weak here, and it is worth being precise. A private GitHub
      repository keeps your source code private, but a published Pages site is
      still public on the internet on Free, Pro, and Team plans. Private Pages,
      where a project site is restricted to people with repository read access,
      exists only on GitHub Enterprise Cloud. So a private repo does not give you
      a private site for most accounts.

Vercel can put deployment protection in front of a site: Vercel
      Authentication on all plans, and password protection as a paid add-on on
      Pro. Those controls are designed for previews and team environments, not
      for handing a single private link to one outside recipient. If your core
      requirement is "this URL should only be seen by the people I choose,"
      neither platform is built around that.

## Best-for, at a glance

  -  GitHub Pages: documentation sites, project pages, blogs,
        and hand-built static sites where the code already lives in a public repo
        and you want zero hosting cost.

 -  Vercel: framework-based sites and apps that need preview
        deploys, fast builds, server-side rendering, or serverless functions, and
        where a team is collaborating on the project.

## Side by side

    Criterion GitHub Pages Vercel Stacktree     Hosting model Static files served from a Git repo App platform with build and deploy pipeline Direct HTML publish, no repo or project   How you ship Git push to a branch (optional Actions build) Git push, auto build, preview per commit An agent tool call (publish_html) or upload   Dynamic capability Static only, no server runtime Serverless and edge functions, SSR Static HTML only (no serverless backends)   Custom domains Yes, free, with HTTPS Yes, on every plan, managed TLS Yes, from $19/mo (Cloudflare for SaaS)   Pricing model Free within usage limits Free Hobby, then per-seat Pro plus usage Flat workspace: Solo, Studio, Firm. Never per-seat   Private by default No (Enterprise Cloud only for private sites) No (deployment protection on paid plans) Yes, unguessable URL plus optional gates   Best for Public static sites and docs Framework apps needing builds and functions Private, one-off artifacts agents emit

## The third option: when neither shape fits

GitHub Pages and Vercel both assume a Git workflow and, by default, public
      delivery. That is the right fit for a site you maintain over time. It is
      the wrong fit for a different and increasingly common thing: a private,
      one-off artifact, a report, [a dashboard](/host-ai-dashboard), a prototype, a generated document,
      that an AI agent just produced and that you want to send to one or two
      people without it becoming a repository or a tracked project.

  [Stacktree](/private-html-hosting) is built for that gap. It is
      private-by-default HTML hosting where every URL is unguessable, so the link
      itself is the credential. There is no repo to create and no build to
      configure. An agent calls `publish_html` over MCP from Claude
      Code, Cursor, Codex, or Claude.ai and gets back a live link, and
`update_site` replaces the content in place so the URL stays
      stable across iterations. See
[how agents publish HTML over MCP](/mcp-publish-html) and the
[agent loop hosting](/agent-loop-hosting) pattern.

On access control, where both platforms are thin, Stacktree layers an
      unguessable URL on every plan, an optional shared password, an optional
      email-domain gate verified by magic link, and optional end-to-end
      encryption where the server only ever sees ciphertext. The two gates are
      paid, starting at Solo. The first publish is anonymous and lasts 24 hours
      with no account, and a free account gets 3 pages that last 7 days, or once someone
      else opens one, 30 days after their latest visit, up to 90 days in total. [Pricing](/pricing) is a flat workspace
      plan (Solo at $19/mo, Studio at $79/mo, Firm at $249/mo), never per-seat, and you
      can [self-host](/self-host) the source-available stack on your
      own Cloudflare.

To keep this fair: Stacktree is not trying to replace either tool on its
      home turf. It hosts static HTML only, so it is not an app platform like
      Vercel, and it is not built for long-lived public marketing sites the way
      Pages is. There is no in-browser live editor, and workspace-wide SSO is on
      the roadmap (a per-link email-domain gate covers most cases today). If you
      want a public site you maintain over time, use Pages or Vercel. If you want
      a private link for something an agent made, that is the case Stacktree is
      shaped around. More context on the
[private GitHub Pages
      alternative](/github-pages-private-alternative) and the broader
[static app alternative](/static-app-alternative).

FAQ

## Frequent questions

     Is GitHub Pages or Vercel better for a static site? +  Both serve static files well. GitHub Pages is simpler and free when your code already lives in a public repo. Vercel adds preview deploys, faster framework builds, and a path to serverless functions later. Pick Pages for plain static, Vercel when you expect dynamic features or team review.   Can GitHub Pages host a private site? +  Only on GitHub Enterprise Cloud, where access control restricts a project site to people with read access to the repository. On Free, Pro, and Team plans, a published Pages site is public on the internet even when the source repo is private. For most accounts, Pages has no viewer gate.   Is Vercel free? What does the Hobby plan cover? +  Vercel Hobby is free and limited to non-commercial, personal use. It includes builds, custom domains, and serverless functions within monthly usage limits. Commercial work and team collaboration move you to Pro, which is a per-seat monthly plan starting at $20 per deploying member plus usage.   Can GitHub Pages run server-side code? +  No. GitHub Pages serves static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript only, with an optional Jekyll build. There is no server runtime, no API routes, and no database. If you need server-side rendering or backend endpoints, Vercel functions or another app platform is the right tool.   Do both support custom domains and HTTPS? +  Yes. GitHub Pages supports custom domains with automatic HTTPS at no cost. Vercel supports custom domains with managed TLS on every plan, including the free Hobby tier. Setup on both is a DNS change plus verification, so neither has a real advantage here.   When does neither GitHub Pages nor Vercel fit? +  When the thing you are publishing is a private, one-off artifact, a report, a prototype, an export, that should not become a repository or a tracked project. Both platforms assume a Git workflow and public delivery. A private-by-default link host fits that case better.
Keep reading

## Related guides

   -  [ Publish HTML over MCP How agents ship a live link with one tool call, no repo or build step. ](/mcp-publish-html)
-  [ Private GitHub Pages alternative What to use when a private repo still leaves your Pages site public. ](/github-pages-private-alternative)
-  [ Static app alternative For one-off static artifacts that should not become a full app project. ](/static-app-alternative)
-  [ Private HTML hosting Unguessable URLs, password, email-domain gate, and end-to-end encryption. ](/private-html-hosting)
-  [ Agent loop hosting Stable URLs with replace-in-place updates across an agent iteration loop. ](/agent-loop-hosting)
-  [ All hosting alternatives Compare Stacktree against the other places people publish HTML. ](/alternatives)
-  [ Tiiny Host vs Netlify Tiiny Host is drag-and-drop static hosting; Netlify is a Git-driven platform with build pipelines, forms, and functions. ](/compare/tiiny-host-vs-netlify)

References

## Sources and further reading

   -  [ GitHub Pages documentation ↗ Official docs: static publishing, custom domains, HTTPS, and usage limits. ](https://docs.github.com/en/pages)
-  [ GitHub Pages site visibility (Enterprise Cloud) ↗ Where private Pages access control is available, and where it is not. ](https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/pages/getting-started-with-github-pages/changing-the-visibility-of-your-github-pages-site)
-  [ Vercel plans and pricing ↗ Free Hobby tier, per-seat Pro starting at $20/month, and usage charges. ](https://vercel.com/pricing)
-  [ Vercel functions documentation ↗ Serverless and edge functions, the dynamic capability Pages lacks. ](https://vercel.com/docs/functions)

##  Publishing something an agent made?

 Skip the repo and the build. Get a private, unguessable link in one tool call, and replace it in place as you iterate.

 [ Sign up free → ](https://app.stacktr.ee/?join=1&from=cta_compare_github_pages_vs_vercel)   install npx stacktree-install
Copy
       Private hosting for the HTML your agents make.

[](https://betalist.com/startups/stacktree?utm_campaign=badge-stacktree&utm_medium=badge&utm_source=badge-featured)[Featured on](https://devhunt.org/tool/stacktree)[](https://buildlist.io)[Get started free](https://app.stacktr.ee/?join=1)

## Product

- [Page video](/page-video)
- [Ask this page](/ask-this-page)
- [Client spaces](/client-spaces)
- [Templates](/templates)
- [Example deliverables](/examples)
- [Custom domains](/custom-domains)
- [Client feedback](/client-feedback-loop)
- [One-time links](/one-time-view-links)
- [See how pages get read](/page-engagement)
- [Made with Stacktree](/made-with)
- [Security](/security)
- [Watch the demo](/demo)

## Agents

- [All integrations](/agents)
- [Claude Code](/claude-code)
- [OpenAI Codex](/codex)
- [Cursor](/cursor)
- [Claude.ai connector](/claude-ai-connector)
- [Claude Cowork](/what-is-claude-cowork)
- [Meta Muse](/muse)
- [MCP server](/mcp-publish-html)
- [Deploy from Claude Code](/deploy-html-from-claude-code)
- [Skills](/skills)
- [Slack app](/slack)
- [n8n node](/n8n)
- [Agent payments (x402)](/x402)

## Alternatives

- [All comparisons](/alternatives)
- [Head-to-head comparisons](/compare)
- [Tiiny Host](/tiiny-host-alternative)
- [GitHub Pages (private)](/github-pages-private-alternative)
- [Vercel](/vercel-alternative-for-agents)
- [ngrok](/ngrok-alternative-for-html)
- [Display.dev](/display-dev-alternative)
- [Static.app](/static-app-alternative)
- [OpenAI Codex Sites](/openai-codex-sites-alternative)
- [here.now](/here-now-alternative)
- [Shippage](/shippage-ai-alternative)
- [Best private hosting](/best-private-html-hosting)

## Use cases

- [All use cases](/use-cases)
- [Share with clients](/share-with-clients)
- [Send a file to a client](/share-html-file-with-client)
- [Share Claude artifacts](/share-claude-artifacts)
- [Share Jupyter notebooks](/share-jupyter-notebook-html)
- [Host Storybook privately](/host-storybook-privately)
- [Architecture diagrams](/share-architecture-diagrams)
- [AI-generated reports](/host-ai-reports)
- [Internal HTML tools](/internal-tool-hosting)
- [Private HTML hosting](/private-html-hosting)
- [Vibe-coded page hosting](/vibe-coding-hosting)
- [Leave a website builder](/website-builder-migration)

## Learn

- [Blog](/blog)
- [Glossary](/glossary)
- [FAQ](/faq)
- [Where AI output should live](/where-ai-output-lives)
- [Agent-loop hosting](/agent-loop-hosting)
- [Why agents need a publish primitive](/blog/why-agents-need-a-publish-primitive)
- [MCP servers explained](/blog/mcp-servers-explained-for-developers)
- [What changed in the 2026-07 MCP spec](/blog/mcp-2026-spec-changes)
- [Sites in Codex explained](/blog/sites-in-codex-explained)
- [Private-by-default hosting](/blog/private-by-default-html-hosting)
- [An agent paid us $1 (x402)](/blog/agent-paid-to-provision-itself)
- [When a loop hits a paywall](/blog/loop-engineering-paywall)
- [Pricing](/pricing)
- [Self-host (new)](/self-host)
- [Changelog](/changelog)
- [Docs](https://stacktr.ee/docs)
- [About](/about)
© 2026 Stacktree · stacktr.ee

[Privacy](/privacy)[Terms](/terms)[Security](/security)[Dashboard](https://app.stacktr.ee)[npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/stacktree-mcp)[Sitemap](/sitemap.xml)[llms.txt](/llms.txt)[API spec](/openapi.json)

---
Full markdown summary of the Stacktree marketing surface: https://stacktr.ee/llms-full.txt
